{"id":198,"date":"2008-12-07T14:40:57","date_gmt":"2008-12-07T12:40:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hume.doesntexist.org\/\/?p=198"},"modified":"2009-07-08T23:30:18","modified_gmt":"2009-07-08T21:30:18","slug":"over-spinoza-in-de-treatise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/?p=198","title":{"rendered":"Over Spinoza in de Treatise"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">1.4.5 Hume bestrijdt Spinoza.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\">\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm;\"><a name=\"{232}\"><\/a><a name=\"FolioHit1\"><\/a> This gives me an occasion to take anew into consideration the question concerning the substance of the soul; and though I have condemned that question as utterly unintelligible, yet I cannot forbear proposing some further reflections concerning it. I assert that the doctrine of the immateriality, simplicity, and indivisibility of a thinking substance is a true atheism, and will serve to justify all those sentiments for which <span style=\"color: #ffffff;\"><strong><span style=\"background: #cc6666 none repeat scroll 0% 0%;\">Spinoza<\/span><\/strong><\/span> is so universally infamous. From this topic I hope at least to reap one advantage, that my adversaries will not have any pretext to render the present doctrine odious by their declamations when they see that they can be so easily retorted on them.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding: 0cm 0cm 0.04cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; border: medium medium 2.5pt none none solid -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\"><em>In een behandeling van eerst klassieke sceptici en daarna moderne filosofen gaat Hume in tegen Spinoza n.a.v. diens overtuiging dat er een alomtegenwoordige Substantie is: pantheisme.\u00c2\u00a0 Over de connectie tussen Hume en Spinoza is gepubliceerd door Wim Klever,\u00c2\u00a0 Annette C. Baier, Frank J. Leavitt en Vance Maxwell.<br \/>\n<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1.4.5 Hume bestrijdt Spinoza. This gives me an occasion to take anew into consideration the question concerning the substance of the soul; and though I have condemned that question as utterly unintelligible, yet I cannot forbear proposing some further reflections concerning it. I assert that the doctrine of the immateriality, simplicity, and indivisibility of a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[191],"tags":[69,8,68,67,66,65,50,15,58],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=198"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":200,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions\/200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archief.somtijds.nl\/hume-blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}